Oct 5, 2020
6 minutes read
So you’re an MSL. You’ve completed your doctorate or medical training and you’re well prepared to meet with key opinion leaders (KOLs) and speak intelligently about your company’s products. But do the people who make decisions about your career – your boss, your boss’s boss, and so on – really know what you’re doing? Or how well you’re doing it? Furthermore, does senior management even know what an MSL does?
You’d be surprised how little top pharmaceutical executives know about medical affairs and the MSL role. That’s why tracking MSLs’ performance is so important to communicate the value that they bring to the organization.
MSL key performance indicators (KPIs) have evolved from solely tracking hard metrics, such as the number of KOL relationships and frequency of office visits, to incorporate more soft metrics, such as speaker capabilities and business acumen. Although soft metrics are notoriously harder to track, they’re really critical to showcasing the value that MSLs bring to the table.
Traditional MSL KPIs tend to be hard, activity-based metrics designed for liaisons to accumulate face-time with as many thought leaders as possible. These structures for these metrics originate from the sales rep model, where more details yield positive results for the company. But we all know that MSLs are not the same as sales reps and, therefore, their KPIs need to reflect something more.
Don’t get me wrong, there’s absolutely a place for hard-number KPIs to track MSL performance. Many of the traditional metrics demonstrate value to upper management. These KPIs include:
There are many other hard metrics that companies use to measure MSLs, such as the percentage of time spent in the field, the number of medical conferences an MSL attends, and the number of scientific presentations delivered to healthcare providers. All of these present varying levels of value to the organization. But it’s MSLs’ soft skills that tend to bring the most value to the company.
The idea of measuring a soft skill seems impractical. These skills aren’t something you can necessarily attach a number to. But companies want to see their MSLs possess certain characteristics. At the very least, top performers are rewarded for learning and demonstrating these skills. Let’s take a look at a few:
Additional soft metrics that companies track include how well you train others, the depth of your KOL interactions, and the type of market insights you bring back from your KOL meetings.
Part of the challenge is that there isn’t a set of industry-wide metrics with which we measure MSL performance. If there were a consensus on what makes an MSL effective, it would have to combine the ability to build valuable KOL relationships (soft metric) with the number of those relationships the MSLS manages (hard metric). MSL performance is one of those things that’s hard to define and communicate up the chain. It boils down to knowing it when you see it. But that doesn’t mean there aren’t skills you can’t practice routinely to improve as an MSL.